Author Topic: Nutritionists at Risk In California-please sign petition against AB 575  (Read 2329 times)

Offline angiel

  • Alumni
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
Your action is needed- RD's presenting a law in Sacramento on Tuesday

This was Posted by: "julie@healthfulliving.org
on the Weston A. Price – SF Chapter  Yahoo group-

I clicked on the link and sent the opposition letter to Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan, Governor Edmund Brown and
Senator Mark DeSaulnier

This is a serious bill. It would make it illegal for ANYONE other
than RDs to practice nutrition in California (that would include any
nutritionists, chiropractors, PhD's, etc). It would create a monopoly
and eliminate consumer access and personal choice on who you can see
and not see for nutrition advice. This is an attack the ADA has tried
in 40 states. Please show your support by following the link and
letting our state representatives know your opinion:

https://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=731

Imagine committing FELONY and going to jail for giving advice on food? Even
if you are a nutritionist with a Masters or a PhD?! The registered
dietitians (RD) assn. are trying to get a bill passed limiting nutritional
advisors to exclusively RDs only. Please sign up to oppose it, repost and
share the link: http://bit.ly/hveMQh

Original link:
https://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=705
<https://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=705>

Opposition Letter:

I am writing to voice my strongest opposition to a bill that was recently introduced. AB 575 creates the Dietitians Bureau in the Department of Consumers Affairs, and an advisory committee made up of dietitians -- guaranteeing a biased system against nutritionists.

Under this bill, nutritionists must go through the dietetic program and licensure in order to practice nutrition therapy: the language explicitly states that licensure requires completion of registration examination administered by the American Dietetic Association, and requires that "only a person licensed as a dietitian...shall practice dietetics or medical nutritional therapy" -- a practice that is innately discriminatory against nutritionists.

Even if the nutritionist holds a Masters or a PhD in nutrition, he or she would still be required to complete registration through the ADA in order to keep practicing. This is the organization that lists among its corporate sponsors soft drink giants Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, cereal manufacturers General Mills and Kellogg's, candy maker Mars, and Unilever, the multinational corporation that owns many of the world's consumer products brands in foods and beverages -- not what most would say are the healthiest foods to be consuming.

Nutritionists and dietitians employ differing therapeutic philosophies with different degrees of expertise and training. In general, nutritionists have comprehensive knowledge of how nutrition impacts the whole body; they focus on medical nutrition therapy, metabolism, and biochemistry; and they work primarily in private practice settings conducting one-on-one nutrition counseling. Nutritionists practice an integrative approach to medicine and concentrate on prevention and treatment of chronic disease. Dietitians, on the other hand, are experts in nutrition science with training focusing on institutional diets and food service management -- developing diets for hospital patients, school food service programs, and nursing homes.

This legislation would impede an individual's right to access highly qualified nutritional therapists of their choice, and would prohibit hundreds of qualified practitioners from providing nutritional therapy.
I strongly oppose AB 575, and ask you to fight for its defeat.

Angie Loukos,
N.C. Student at Bauman College

Offline Nori

  • Faculty
  • ****
  • Posts: 836
    • Radiant Vitality
Angie,

This is so important. The NANP as we know it got its start when this issue surfaced 10 years ago.  I do hope everyone who is on this Forum will help defeat this bill as our rights to practice will be affected adversely if it passes.
Nori M. Hudson, BA, MS
Instructor, Bauman College, Berkeley
Board Certified in Holistic Nutrition by and Registered with NANP
Certified Diet Counselor, Nutrition Educator,  Nutrition Consultant, and Nutrition Teacher through Bauman College

Offline Ed Bauman

  • President
  • Faculty
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Greetings friends, students, graduates, colleagues and natural health advocates

A bill has been presented to the CA Assembly bill AB 575 which if passed, will affect your right to work with a  highly qualified nutritional professional of your choice if you are a consumer in California. It will also prohibit non RD's from practicing Medical Nutrition.

The bill does not prohibit nutrition education, food, nutrition or diet counseling, retail sales or the marketing of nutritional products. It allows for non-medical nutrition advising.  We have a semantic issues to explain to our folks, to dietitians and to the state legislators on the difference between RD's and NC's. Those most affected are folks who practice Clinical, Functional, or Therapeutic Nutrition in a medical setting (clinic, hospital, rehab center) and working with people with pre-existing medical problems. Anyone in violation of this statute, should it pass would be charged with a misdemeanor, with up to a $1000 fine and/or 6 month jail time. Ten years ago, a similar Dietetic bill would have charged us with a felony. Most of the language of the bill is to ask the Assembly to set up a Licensing Board for Dietitians, which will cost the state time and money (which they don't have). The problem with the bill as written is that non-RD's aren't eligible to join the Ca Dietitic Association, so that they could be licensed to practice, hence putting the onus on the state to enforce non-RD medical nutrition practice, which I doubt they are equipped to do.

The first hearing of AB 575 will be heard before Assembly Committee on Business, Professions and Consumer Protections on Tuesday April 26th, 2011 in Sacramento, CA. This bill is being introduced by the CDA (California Dietetics Association) and Under this bill nutritionists must become licensed dietitians in order to practice! This would create a monopoly for RD’s as clinical nutrition providers.

This is a very hot topic that has been playing out in many states and I encourage you to take action RIGHT AWAY so you don’t lose your freedom of choice and/or your right to work!

Here are some resources for you to learn more:

*************************************

The Bill

Here is proposed bill itself

Summary

It’s pretty heavy reading so here is a nice summary of what the bill actually means – from the Alliance for Natural Health

Interview with ANH and Ed Bauman

Martin Mathews of www.nourishinghope.org interviewed Nandini (Alliance for Natural Health www.anh-usa.org) and Dr Ed Bauman (Bauman College www.baumancollege.org) on Reality Sandwich on Thursday and you can listen to this 15 minute interview here.

Interview with Coco Newton and Liz Lipski

And a few weeks ago I interviewed Coco Newton, RD, CCN and Liz Lipski PhD, CCN on a preview call promoting our annual NANP (www.nanp.org) conference April 31, May 1.  You can listen to this 30 minute interview here.  Coco’s topic will address similar issues the nutrition professionals have experienced in Michigan.  Coco is very active in the Michigan Nutrition Association and they have very useful information on their site (http://www.michigannutritionassociation.org/)

Latest newsletter from Alliance for Natural Health (www.anh-usa.org):

“California Assembly Bill 575 creates a monopoly on nutrition services for dietitians, in effect denying consumers access to expert advice from nutritionists, some of the most highly educated and well-respected professionals in the field of nutrition. Presented as a regular licensing bill for dietitians this bill actually limits the practice of other nutrition professionals. Under this bill nutritionists must go through the dietetic program and licensure in order to practice medical nutrition therapy.

The  American Dietetic Association (ADA) has sponsored legislation in over 40 states. This is the organization that lists among its corporate sponsors soft drink giants Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, cereal manufacturers General Mills and Kellogg’s, candy maker Mars, and Unilever, the multinational corporation that owns many of the world’s consumer products brands in foods and beverages.

The negative implications of AB 575 are far reaching.

    * Bad for an already struggling California economy. This bill would effectively eliminate an entire profession and removes all competition in the field of nutrition services.
    * Dampens freedom of choice in healthcare: Nutritionists and dietitians have entirely different philosophical approaches. Each individual has unique nutritional needs and therefore deserve access to choice. It’s not a one-size-fits-all approach.
    * Threatens to increase chronic health indicators among Californians: Nutritionists practice an integrative approach to medicine and concentrate on prevention and treatment of chronic disease. Access to nutritionists should be broadened, not reduced.
    * Penalizes a higher standard of education and training: For example, Certified Nutrition Specialists certified by the Certification Board for Nutrition Specialists (CBNS) have a Master’s degree at a minimum, usually a Ph.D., yet are excluded by this bill unless they meet the requirements of dietitians.”

IF YOU ARE A CALIFORNIA RESIDENT – WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW

**************************************************************

If you are a California resident there are a number of things you can do – I’ve outlined these steps below. Please take action before Tuesday next week if you feel this is something you feel strongly about!

(1)  Alliance for Natural Health has a page that will generate a letter for you to automatically send to

* Your Governor
* Your State Senator or Senators
* Your State Representative or Representatives
* All the committee members

Just enter your name, address and modify the sample text letter as you see fit .

****** FAX YOUR OPPOSITION LETTER TO BILL SPONSOR MARY HAYASHI AND CALL THE OTHER LEGISLATORS BELOW ********
****************************************************

Go here to create and send this letter.

(2) Call and email the Committee members and tell them what you think.  Calling is often more effective than emailing!

It’s also very effective to write your own personal letter expressing how you feel. Make sure to send this to all the committee members (see below) AND your own representative (if he/she is not on the committee).

Business and Professional Practices Assembly Committee Members

Mary Hayashi – Chair,  Dem-18

She introduced AB 475. Her district include Berkeley and the East Bay.
(916) 319-2018
Assemblymember.Hayashi@assembly.ca.gov
Letters can be faxed here: (916) 319-2118

Bill Berryhill – Vice Chair, Rep-26
(916) 319-2026
Assemblymember.Bill.Berryhill@assembly.ca.gov

Michael Allen, Dem-7
(916) 319-2007
Assemblymember.Allen@assembly.ca.gov

Betsy Butler,  Dem-53
(916) 319-2053
Assemblymember.Butler@assembly.ca.gov

Mike Eng, Dem-49
(916) 319-2049
Assemblymember.Eng@assembly.ca.gov

Curt Hagman, Rep-60
(916) 319-2060
Assemblymember.Hagman@assembly.ca.gov

Jerry Hill,  Dem-19
(916) 319-2019
Assemblymember.Hill@assembly.ca.gov

Fiona Ma, Dem-12
(916) 319-2012
Assemblymember.Ma@assembly.ca.gov

Cameron Smyth, Rep-38
(916) 319-2038
Assemblymember.Smyth@assembly.ca.gov

(3)   Please share this information with family, colleagues and clients, post on social media, blog about it and add it to your ezines

(4)   I and at least six other nutrition professionals will be attending the hearing on Tuesday – if you would like to come and show your support please email Trudy Scott <trudyscottcn@yahoo.com> and/or show up between 9am and 12:30pm. Everyone present will be able to stand and show opposition. This hearing will only be given 10-15 minutes, so all won't be able to speak.  Location: CAPITAL BUILDING – Old side The hearing d side) 4th floor, Room 447.

(5)   Consider volunteering your time, either now or in the coming weeks and months  – this issue won’t be going away any time soon and we could do with the help of folks with any legal experience and/or organizing experience

(6)   Consider joining the Alliance for Natural Health http://www.anh-usa.org, an organization dedicated to promoting sustainable health and freedom of choice in healthcare through good science and good law. They protect the right of natural-health practitioners to practice and the right of consumers to choose the healthcare options they prefer. Membership is just $25 a year

(7)   If you are reading this and are a nutrition professional and are a lapsed or not yet a member of the NANP  – National Association of Nutrition Professionals (www.nanp.org), consider joining NANP so together we can stay informed and serve as nutrition professionals.  Trudy Scott is the current President of the NANP Board. Nicole Hodson is the Exec Director. I am a special advisor, so now is a good time for me (and us) to step up to the plate.

(8)   Finally we’d love to see you at our annual NANP conference next weekend April 30/May 1 in San Francisco.  Coco Newton, RD, CCN and Liz Lipski, Ph.D., CCN will be presenting and sharing Dietetic laws and consequences in Michigan and North Carolina.  Register here.

If you are not a California resident

If you are not a California resident I encourage keep informed as this has happened in other states and may come to your state next.  Your best bet is to join the Alliance for Natural Health http://www.anh-usa.org which is part of an international organization dedicated to promoting sustainable health and freedom of choice in healthcare through good science and good law. They protect the right of natural-health practitioners to practice and the right of consumers to choose the healthcare options they prefer.  Membership is just $25 a year!


Organizations, schools, practitioners and consumers are coming together to make this happen. I’m blown away by all the support and assistance! And would like to acknowledge the following people/groups:  the NANP board members and staff (www.nanp.org), Ed Bauman PhD (www.baumancollege.org), Martin Mathews (www.nourishinghope.org), Nandini Gopinadh and Gretchen DuBeau (www.anh-usa.org), Dr David Brady (http://www.bridgeport.edu) Dr Anna Kelles PhD (www.nycc.edu), Donna Kelley MS, Krysti Hyllen, JJ Virgin CNS, CHFI, Lisa Bryant NE, Michael Stroka, Judy Stone, Corinne Bush MS, CNS, Dana Reed, MS, CNS (www.reednutrition.com) and all the other concerned people and groups too many to mention!

Let's speak with one voice in solidarity so we can educate our legislators on who we are, what we do and why our right to practice is so important at this time.



In Health and Good Taste

Ed Bauman, M.Ed., Ph.D.
Founder and President
Bauman College:Holistic Nutrition & Culinary Arts
www.baumancollege.org
(707) 795-1284


"Eating for Health is an idea whose time has come to change cell, self and community health"
 

President, Bauman College
Clinical Director, Bauman Nutrition Clinic
Facilitator, Vitality Fasting Retreats
Ph.D. in Health Promotion, U of New Mexico
M.Ed. in Education, U of Massachusetts
President, Board of Directors, NANP
Faculty, JFKU,New College

Offline angiel

  • Alumni
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
Our e-mails are working, I just got this e-mail from the N.A.N.P. (Although I am still worried about the "revisions".  But maybe the revisions will be okay for Bauman graduates?).......

Greetings!
 
We had a small victory today. California Assembly Bill 575 was pulled from committee due to the volume of correspondence opposing the bill.   
 
The bill will not be presented until revisions are made. The earliest the bill can be presented is next Tuesday. If the bill is not revised and presented by Tuesday, May 3rd, it will not be presented until next year. We will know more on Friday and will send a communication out at that time.
 

Thanks for your support - our coordinated efforts had a huge impact today.
 

Offline Marlina E

  • Associate Director
  • Administrator
  • **
  • Posts: 1652
    • Bauman College Online
Here is a chart that Ed created to articulate the issue when he speaks to the legislative board tomorrow.
BA Environmental Studies UCSB
Nutrition Consultant

Offline Marlina E

  • Associate Director
  • Administrator
  • **
  • Posts: 1652
    • Bauman College Online
The bill was pulled from the floor. Here is the email I just got from Ed, who was in Sacramento to speak, should the bill come forward:

Dietetics not brought to committee today. Done for this year. Spoke w lobbyist who drafts amendments.

He assured me that out school and grads are not at any risk and he will show me the modifications in the scope of practice that will reflect this.

Chow for now, Ed

BA Environmental Studies UCSB
Nutrition Consultant

Offline angiel

  • Alumni
  • ***
  • Posts: 28
Thanks to all who signed the petition and letters.  Ed's AB575 chart was clear and succinct.  Ed truly is a leader in the holistic health field.

Hugs to all,

Angie